tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post5817902950513219519..comments2023-09-02T08:32:23.919-07:00Comments on Mathematical Poetry: Disappearing ContextKaz Maslankahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10215535360917928880noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-74594035604228619382009-09-17T14:53:50.531-07:002009-09-17T14:53:50.531-07:00Dear Karl, the only mystery is why you should thin...Dear Karl, the only mystery is why you should think it a mystery(:<br />If the numbers themselves are allowed to be "metaphoric" (as your interpretations of God above suggest) then "mathematical" poetry is in danger of subverting its "operational" functions also (which by the way, i don't mind) but what i take from Kaz's blog is that the operational function of "mathematical poetry" obeys the laws of "mathematics" and not(?) linguistic association (or rather that it is irrelevant if it does). If the integrity of the mathematical operation is compromised its not mathematical poetry --- the possibility of dividing by a Zero or an Infinity to create a Zero is forebodden! It can and does lead to contradiction(s). To me, mathematical poetry "is" (and remains) a linguistic enterprise, AND does not require an "operation" to keep all the units together or appart. Exploring the beauty of prime numbers "is" mathematics.<br />love + anarchy<br />TT.O.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-56886998082480055382009-09-17T08:28:44.057-07:002009-09-17T08:28:44.057-07:001: 0 can be looked upon as the doorway through whi...1: 0 can be looked upon as the doorway through which the big bang said hello and/or through which the unmanifested manifested creation. ie all for one, one for all.<br /><br />or<br /><br />2: for the dualists', god’s open mouth saying the ‘word’ that made the creation.<br /><br />3: in either case, this 0 is a nothing that is a something that is, is not and not is not.<br /><br />from my viewing point in the mystery.<br /><br />karl kemptonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-84524768718171422962009-09-15T00:30:12.144-07:002009-09-15T00:30:12.144-07:00Yes everything seems relative.
Thanks,
KYes everything seems relative. <br />Thanks,<br />KKaz Maslankahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10215535360917928880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-79184010376597622592009-09-14T15:20:02.081-07:002009-09-14T15:20:02.081-07:00dear kaz
i think it is also pertinent to point out...dear kaz<br />i think it is also pertinent to point out here, that division by "zero" is not permissible and or nonsensical (mathematically) leading to such extrodinary absurdities as 1 = 2, or that God exists, or that there is Hono(u)r in War etc --- i guess it all depends on whether God is Nothing, 3, or Infinity<br />love + anarchy<br />TT.O.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com