tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post115631099683018632..comments2023-09-02T08:32:23.919-07:00Comments on Mathematical Poetry: Grumman on SchlegelKaz Maslankahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10215535360917928880noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-21794282409948383382013-09-04T23:00:29.869-07:002013-09-04T23:00:29.869-07:00It took you seven years to read my blog? I thought...It took you seven years to read my blog? I thought you were interested in this field? Ha!:)<br /><br />---- Beauty has to be sensual? - So you don't find pure mathematics as beautiful? Or do you find pondering math sensual? Kaz Maslankahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10215535360917928880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10950488.post-14213049754068245622013-09-04T17:47:30.479-07:002013-09-04T17:47:30.479-07:00Just now saw this for the first time, Kaz. Was lo...Just now saw this for the first time, Kaz. Was looking for something else, but glad to happen on it, for I'm about to write about the Schlegel, stealing it from you site (if you don't mind), and will quote and respond to what you've said here.<br /><br />Only one small comment now: that I bring up the lack of sensuality or the physical in the Schlegel because I define beauty as being sensual--yes, my definition, not necessarily the world's. The beauty Russell and others find in math is similar and equal to what I consider aesthetic beauty, but different.VizPo-Centralhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16289253159301582507noreply@blogger.com