Thursday, December 21, 2006
Monday, December 18, 2006
Lothar Schmitz
Lothar Schmitz’ sculptures reconfigure and question corporate landscape elements using man-made materials. His topiary-like treatment of landscape alludes to the accelerating pace of ecological change and genetic mutation. He draws experience from both his art and physics background. Schmitz is a past Los Angeles Cultural Affairs COLA Individual Artist Grant recipient and a physicist.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTRARY TO THE LAWS OF NATURE
Los Angeles based artists stretch those laws and present some of their own.Mitchell Friedman, Manfred Menz, Lothar Schmitz, Carrie Ungerman and Melinda Smith Altshuler address social, environmental and psychological circumstance in the landscape. Exhibition Dates: December 21, 2006 - January 27, 2007Artist’s Reception: Thursday, December 21, 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
Sarah Lee Artworks & Projects
2525 Michigan Avenue (Bergamot Station), T1, Santa Monica, CA 90402
Media Contact: Melinda Smith Altshuler, 310 367.5246, msasees@yahoo.com
Gallery: 310 829.4938 E-mail, saralee4@verizon.net
Website: http://www.sarahleeartworks.com
Gallery hours: Tuesday through Saturday 10:30 am- 5:30 pmPlease direct e-mail inquiries about the exhibition to the gallery’s address (above);
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 10:23 PM 0 comments
Sunday, November 26, 2006
Celebrate The Tenth Annual Bridges Conference
Celebrate the Tenth Annual Bridges Conference
BRIDGES DONOSTIA
Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture
***************************************
**** http://www.bridgesmathart.org ****
***************************************
Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science
School of Architecture, The University of the Basque Country
San Sebastian (Donostia), Spain
July 24-27, 2007
The conference consists of a 4-day combination of Bridges Conference
activities (July 24, 26, and 27) and an excursion day to Bilbao (July
25). Please visit the Announcement page at the conference website for
a complete announcement.
THE CONFERENCE
The Bridges Conferences, running annually since 1998, bring together
practicing mathematicians, scientists, artists, educators, musicians,
writers, computer scientists, sculptors, dancers, weavers, model
builders in a lively atmosphere of exchange and mutual encouragement.
Important components of these conferences, in addition to formal
presentations, include hands-on workshops, gallery displays of visual
art, working sessions with artists who are crossing the
mathematics-arts boundaries, and musical/theatrical events in the
evening.
CALL FOR PAPERS
You are invited to submit either a short (two pages) or long (at most
eight pages) paper that presents new work within the scope of the
Bridges conference. Papers must be submitted as Microsoft Word or PDF
to papers@bridgesmathart.org. The deadline for paper submission is
Febrary 1, 2007. This deadline is firm! If electronic submission is
impossible, please contact Reza Sarhangi to make other arrangements.
Authors will be notified of acceptance on March 25, 2007, and final
papers will be due on April 23.
WORKSHOPS
There will be several teacher workshops for K-12 teachers and educators
at the 2007 Bridges Conference. If you are interested in making a
presentation in one of these workshops you need to submit either a
short (two page) or long (eight page) paper; The deadlines for
submissions of preliminary and final versions are the same as for the
contributed papers.
VISUAL ART EXHIBIT
At the conference, there will be an exhibition room for 2D and 3D
mathematical art, ranging from computer graphics to quilts to
geometrical sculptures. This art exhibit will be curated by Robert
Fathauer. All submitted artwork will undergo a refereeing process.
There is a limit of five submissions per artist. Images of accepted
artworks will also be published on the conference CD.
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
There is a registration fee of US $180 that includes a copy of the
Proceedings. Extra proceedings will be available during the conference
with a price of US $50. There is a special discounted rate for
students, artists whose expenses are not otherwise supported, and K-12
teachers. Please visit the Registration page at the conference
website.
ACCOMMODATION AND FACILITIES
Participants have a choice of staying in the campus facilities
(comparable to a three star hotel and within walking distance of the
conference site) or staying in a nearby hotels (a list of hotels is
provided in the Accommodations section of the Bridges website).
MAILING LIST
You have received this message because you are subscribed to a mailing
list for Bridges-related announcements. If you would like to manage
your subscription, please visit the mailing list web page at
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/bridges.
Anyone interested in joining the list may send email to
bridges-join@lists.uwaterloo.ca.
OTHER INQUIRIES
For any other information not available on the web page please
contact: Reza Sarhangi, Department of Mathematics, Towson University,
8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, (410) 704-4922. rsarhangi@towson.edu.
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:20 AM 1 comments
Thursday, November 16, 2006
Alligator Cubed
Presently, Dan Waber has some interesting math-poetry related images on his Blog that I would like to draw to attention. There is an interesting series of works by Mirela Roznoveanu that I would like to note, have verbogeometric properties. Although the pieces are not explicitly mathematical (they do not show equations) they do show graphic ideas in space implicitly related to a Cartesian coordinate system.
Because they are so abstract they can have numerous contexts applied to them pointing to meanings just as numerous. The resultant aesthetic experience is a vector sum of all the contexts applied. Of course this is my personal take on this and I will certainly give you room to express your own viewpoint.
Alligator Cubed by Jeff Crouche
The other piece I want to point out is Jeff Crouche’s “Alligators cubed” This is a perfect example of visual mathematical poem. (a nice one at that)
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 10:27 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Applications For Verbogeometry
Shown above is a three-dimensional verbogeometric polyhedral
Applications for Verbogeometry
Neal Goldman, a mathematician has come up with a single verbogeometric polytope to analyze huge amounts of data. Business week online has recently published an article talking about Goldman’s polytope and you can access this article here. I was proposing someone write a polytope poem in my blog entry on August 14, 2006. Goldman’s polytope is not a poem but it can be viewed as a hyper-dimensional verbogeometric structure.
I would like to present an excerpt from the article to arouse your curiosity:
How do you convert written words into math? Goldman says it takes a combination of algebra and geometry. Imagine an object floating in space that has an edge for every known scrap of information. It's called a polytope and it has near-infinite dimensions, almost impossible to conjure up in our earthbound minds. It contains every topic written about in the press. And every article that Inform processes becomes a single line within it. Each line has a series of relationships. A single article on Bordeaux wine, for example, turns up in the polytope near France, agriculture, wine, even alcoholism. In each case, Inform's algorithm calculates the relevance of one article to the next by measuring the angle between the two lines.
Here is the link to the original article from business week online
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:06 AM 0 comments
Labels: Verbogeometry
Sunday, November 05, 2006
Journal of Mathematics and the Arts
I would like to spotlight a new Journal on Mathematics and Art. Edited by Professor Gary R. Greenfield from the University of Richmond in Virginia … I will keep you posted when the first issue comes out.
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 11:26 PM 0 comments
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Upcoming Show in Chicago
For over twenty-five years, PHSColograms, the integration of photography,holography, sculpture, and computer graphics, have created a post-canvas three-dimensional medium that has expanded the visual imagery of the work of a variety of scientists, mathematicians, engineers, architects, and artists.
Paradox. The vessel is a metaphor of our human existence, the body symbolized as a box or bowl is the vessel for the soul. The paradox between the need to belong and the need for individuality; attraction and repulsion; the inside and the outside; materiel expansion and contraction.
Paul V. Galvin Library, Illinois Institute of Technology
35 West 33rd Street, Chicago, IL 60616
Exhibition hours: Monday - Thursday: 12 - 6 pm, Friday: 12 - 5 pm
Saturday: 8:30 am - 5 pm, Sunday: 2 - 6 pm
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 10:45 AM 0 comments
Sunday, October 29, 2006
Bridges London Conference Proceedings
I just received my Bridges 2006 Conference Proceedings today! It is full of wonderful papers for which some of them I plan to review. I recommend you going down to your local bookstore and ordering it! ISBN 0-9665201-7-3
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 9:02 PM 0 comments
Friday, October 27, 2006
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
New Design For My Main Website
I have redesigned my main website with an attempt to make the navigation easier. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:39 PM 0 comments
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Multiple Universe Show Opening Today
“Multiple Universes” show opening today 2 pm to 5 pm … If you are in southern California come join the fun. Above is the map to the show
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:47 AM 2 comments
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Allen L Roland -- EQUATION FOR LOVE AND WORLD PEACE2
I would like to thank the young lady by the name of Tifinie who sent me the link to a ‘myspace.com’ account which had a copy the following essay posted. I am always interested in anyone expressing mathematical poetry. Here is a link to the original source of her information.
The following essay is by Allen L Roland a psychotherapist and political activist who can be found at allenroland.com. Dr. Roland’s essay is a perfect example of mathematical poetry in his metaphorical use illuminating his philosophy. I went to his website and found much of his spiritual and socio-political views to be similar to mine although he is much more aggressive than I.
His poem reminds me of a poem I had done a poem using this same equation. I haven’t published it on my blog because I haven’t made an electronic version of it yet. Maybe this will motivate me to post it later just to contrast this poem and show how the same equation can be used for many vastly different metaphors.
--Kaz
E=mc² / A NEW MATHEMATICAL EQUATION FOR LOVE AND WORLD PEACE
Since we now know that the particles of light ( photons )
are subject to another force ~ and I would argue that that force is a psychic energy field of love and soul consciousness ( The Unified Field ) which exists beyond time and space and whose principle property is the universal urge to unite ~ it's time to add another dimension to Einstein's famous equation ~
E=mc².
E=mc² in Einsteinian terms means that the energy contained in matter is equal to its mass multiplied by the velocity of light squared.
Unfortunately, man, in his limited consciousness, has used this equation to create nuclear bombs and the means to completely destroy mankind.
But we now have growing scientific evidence that light is not the one constant of the Universe and may very well be a condition of state within a greater constant.
David Adam, science correspondent for the Guardian, in an April 11th article entitled Why Einstein may have got it wrong , reports some startling findings as physicists gather in England to celebrate Einstein's work;
"Astronomers will tell experts gathering at Warwick University to celebrate the anniversary of the great man's "miracle year" that the speed of light - Einstein's unchanging yardstick that underpins his special theory of relativity - might be slowing down. Michael Murphy, of the Institute of Astronomy at Cambridge University, said: "We are claiming something extraordinary here. The findings suggest there is a more fundamental theory of the way that light and matter interact; and that special relativity, at its foundation, is actually wrong."
The Bose/ Einstein Condensate established that photons, and now even atoms have a tendency to unite and dance in perfect unison.
Einstein was in a quandry about this phenomenon so he dismissed this obvious attraction of photons as not only spooky but evidently a " tendency to want to travel together " ~ and Einstein later died never realizing he had found his elusive Unified Field.
For, as I have written before, it was Einstein's consciousness that kept him from grasping that he had indeed discovered the Universal primal urge to unite that exists from atoms to human beings ~ and that even galaxies are subject to its universal pull.
As such, this psychic field of love and urge to unite deepest within us cannot be observed through the most powerful electron microscope nor through the lens of the largest telescope, for it is an energy which must be surrendered to and experienced before it can be perceived through the consciousness of the observer.
So now, let us breath fire into Einstein's most famous mathematical equation E=mc² and apply it to a Unified field of love and soul consciousness which could lead us instead to our ultimate fulfillment as human beings;
E = Love ~ The ultimate totalization of human energy ( The Unified Field )
M = Man, the most complex and conscious form of matter that we know.
c²= Consciousness squared.
Thus, the energy of conscious unconditional love, which is deepest within all living matter, is equal to man times his consciousness squared.
British physicist, Steven Hawking, regarded by many as today's successor to Einstein, wrote that there ought to be something special and simple about a theory of everything .
And what could be more special and simple than love.
Finally, at this critical moment for mankind ~ it is imperative that we now recognize that love, not light, is the one constant of the Universe.
ONLY LOVE HEALS
Allen L Roland
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 11:18 PM 0 comments
Thursday, September 28, 2006
The Energy To Break My Heart
Unfortunately to see it you must click here
This poem uses the physics equation for energy E = Fd Energy is also called work "W"
Energy (or work) is the force applied to an object multiplied by distance that object travels
If we pull force out of the context of the sentence above and look at what defines force we will find that Newton’s second law states Force is equal to the mass of an object multiplied by the acceleration the object is experiencing. Now if we look at acceleration we find that acceleration is the change in velocity per the change in time. In our energy equation we are multiplying the F times the distance the object is traveling. The way we calculate distances is with the distance formula. The poem above uses the distance formula in a nine dimensional space where every verbogeometrical axis is described in the poem underneath the radical.
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:21 AM 2 comments
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Optical Illusion Contest
Here is something unrelated to mathematical poetry but interesting none the less. I received this information from my vision science list today. These are the results from the best optical illusion contest of 2006 --- If you are an interested vision scientist, they are now calling for submission to the 2007 contest.
Check out the winners of 2006 here
Go to this page then click on TOP 10 finalists
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 8:24 PM 0 comments
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
The History Of Numbers
Karl Kempton sent me this link ... all I could say was WOW!
check out all these books (click here)
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 12:07 AM 0 comments
Sunday, September 10, 2006
Infinity In Science / Poetry
I tend to think that without logic, you cannot communicate and without communication, you cannot have a philosophy. To me logic presupposes philosophy ... Logic is the supportive structure for thought without it everything would fall apart, no one could predict where our next meal would come from, much less anything else. The other side of the coin is that without a philosophy coloring ones theory of logic, ones logic has no starting point. In this sense, ones logic can have no logic without a philosophical stone to stand on. It is a vicious circle!
The clipping below originally came from a polytope list and was sent to me by my friend the mathematician Paul Gailiunas. My original question to him a few weeks ago concerned the importance of infinity within modern scientific equations. Math poets seem to gravitate toward using infinity in our math poems and as professor Gailiunas told me scientists tend to avoid infinity as much as they can. The following is an example of scientific thinking in this area.
Kaz,
This came from a completely different direction.
I thought you might beinterested.
Paul
On Thu 7 Sep 2006 (21:46:48 +0100), guy@steelpillow.com wrote:On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:54:09, "Wenninger, Magnus"
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 11:09 AM 0 comments
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
The Equation For Aesthetic Measure By Birkhoff
My friend Keith Rowley pointed me at the equation above by 19th century American Mathematician George David Birkhoff. The equation comes from Birkhoff’s 1933 book entitled “Aesthetic Measure”. Here is a perfect example of an equation intended for artistic purpose and yet denotative. Here Birkhoff intends to write an equation to measure levels of aesthetic based on a ratio of order and complexity. Personally, I feel trying to quantify something as broad as the word ‘aesthetic’ is extremely difficult and elusive. I have not read his book so I withhold more comment until I have read what he has to say. My intuition tells me what he is doing is much like my syncopation theory. It will be interesting to see what differences there are.
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 10:22 PM 1 comments
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Scott Glassman Responds
Detail of Factorial for Scott Glassman (above)
Scott Glassman responds to my posting of his poem with my translations. I believe this gives even more detail to the workings of Scott’s poetry:
Kaz,
Your analysis is fantastic, and takes the poem to a very intricate term-bound level, one maybe lurking in logic + subsconscious forces. I always find the tension between emotions and quantification to be wonderful and you elucidate this beautifully in the visualized quotients.
I see how "I" an "I" is divided by elements, sun, burning, moon, etc. "I" or identity, or body, is a ratio of dust and cosmic energy, no better expressed than the direct equations you write out. Seems to cut through the bull to the crux of the matter.
The you - myself graphic you present is compelling because it made me think more about what I was, or my subconscious, was getting out. you - myself = luck. Or getting out of my own head, the ego, is a positive thing and will bring all the benefits. This is a frequent theme in what I write because I often try to disable the "I" and write from some central, unified place. luck = myself + you recognizes that in addition to self-disabling ego-dissolution work, there must also be an outside energy one connects with, an "other" on which "luck" is contingent. (Not really "luck" then anymore I guess is it). love is another product of myself + you.
myself + you = luck / love
an equal ratio of these elements, for someone in love is lucky and vice versa, seemingly to an equal degree
The final part you elucidate is probably the most fascinating because it appears at first to turn the whole logic on its head.
love = myself - you
What I think this is saying, or getting at, is the importance of letting go, of surrendering that which makes one most complete. That human beings or forces ALTHOUGH they may complement one another and co-exist in a single orbit, as do electrons of an atom-- one is not made subservient to the other, one is not made solely for the other's pleasure. Now I'm aware this is entering into the realm of the philosophical, the why-are-we-here-and-seperate question? And I suppose it speaks to the inherent integrity of nature, the particles that solid matter is made from, always particulate, having their boundaries as does the earth, moon, dewdrop, etc. Just above the unified plain, what is visible to the most powerful microscopes. Might be expressed:
myself - you = integrity / love
I'm linking the image and post to my blog. Thanks again for your attention to the poem, opening its dimensions for me.
Scott
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 11:15 AM 0 comments
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Factorial By Scott Glassman
i
am a
quotient of the
sun
i am
a quotient of
the
moon i
am a quotient
of
the one
i am a
quotient
of the
two i am
a
quotient of
the burn i
am
a quotient
of the dew
2.
i
am a
multiple of the
earth
i am
a multiple of
the
sea i
am a multiple
of
the birth
i am a
multiple
of the
tree i am
a
multiple of
the word i
am
a multiple
of the air
3.
i
subtract myself
from you for
luck
i add
myself to you
for
love i
subtract myself from
you
for luck
i add myself
to
you for
love i subtract
myself
from you
for luck i
add
myself to
you for love
4.
i
am zero
over you +
1
i am
zero over you
+
2 minus
0 over you
+
1 minus
0 over you
plus
2 minus
you over me
+
0 minus
1 over you
The poem above is a poem by Scott Glassman called factorial taken from his blog.
I find this poem of Scott Glassman very interesting in that I can see it as an example of mathematical poetry buried inside mathematics poetry. (Click here for the difference between mathematical poetry, mathematics poetry and mathematical visual poetry) The first section of Scott’s poem I have transformed into a piece of mathematical visual poetry. (above) This mathematical visual poem shows four separate mathematical poems that are contained within section one of his mathematics poem.
The verses in the second section have different meanings dependent on whether the poem is lineated or written without lineation. However, both ideas are present in the poem. You can feel the tension between differing statements and the shift in context between the statements due to reading it lineated and then reading it not lineated. I have written out all the mathematical poems/verses I could find contained within this section and displayed them in the image shown above.
The third section functions much the same as the second as far as tension between lineation and reading it without the lineation. However this section has only two statements repeated three times. The interesting part in this section is that the lineation creates two more mathematical poems which are shown in black (above).
The fourth section is a bit more difficult to map out. Therefore I shot a photo of my deductions from the poem. (above) You can see the brackets point to three mathematical poems that are delineated by the brackets inside the mathematics poem. The third one of the three I used algebra to simplify the expression into a compact form/context. Watch the meaning change in this poem through all the metamorphoses.
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 10:42 PM 2 comments
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Geof Huth Mathematical Poetry Links
This page is reserved for Geof Huth's Mathematical Poems and related material
Algebraic Poem #1
Algebraic Poem #2
Algebraic Poem #3
Algebraic Poem #4
Mathematical Graffiti
Posted by Kaz Maslanka at 11:12 PM 0 comments
Labels: Geof Huth